Hunter Biden and a Father's Pardon

Last Monday, US President Joe Biden carried out a presidential duty for the final time when he pardoned two Turkeys, Peach and Blossom. The tradition of a President pardoning a turkey in the run up to Thanksgiving has its roots in the American Civil War, when Abraham Lincoln agreed to a request from his son to spare a turkey named Jack.

As President Biden pardoned the turkeys, there was lots of smiling and laughter. The mood was quite different a few days later however, as Biden did something he had repeatedly promised not to – and issued a post-Thanksgiving pardon to his son Hunter.

As recently as June, Biden said he would ‘not pardon’ his son. who was facing sentencing in two criminal cases on federal gun charges and federal tax evasion charges. Hunter, the first child of a sitting president to be criminally convicted, faced hearings later this month and potentially 17 years behind bars.

In July, the President’s spokesperson denied rumours that a pardon had been discussed: ‘It’s still a no, it will be a no, it is a no and I don’t have anything else to add. Will he pardon his son? No.’ Back then, there was still an election on the horizon, and Biden was still the Democratic candidate. Now, with just 50 days left in office, he has nothing to lose.

Will returning President Donald Trump follow suit and pardon some of those involved in the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021? Biden’s decision makes it easier for him to do so.

People are understandably outraged. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig said that the pardon will ‘tarnish Joe Biden’s legacy…he lied to us for a long time.’

Yet many of the same people who are outraged by Biden’s behaviour (or who will be outraged if Trump follows suit) expect God to do the same thing. The German poet Henrich Heine was asked by a priest on his deathbed if he expected God to forgive him. He is reported to have replied: ‘Of course God will forgive me; that's his job’. That is still a common attitude today: People may be less sure whether there is a God or not – but they are confident that if he exists, he’ll forgive them.  

This attitude is sadly reinforced at many funerals, where those present are assured that the deceased is now in heaven, despite them having had no time for God and never asking for forgiveness. President Biden declared in May that ‘no one is above the law’. It’s a sentiment most of us agree with – yet somehow we expect God to act differently.

At this time of year, many people remember Jesus coming into the world. But why did he come? As Tim Keller memorably put it, Jesus came so that God could end evil without ending us. Jesus’ death was not a tragic accident – it was the very reason he came. God tells us that ‘all have sinned’ – and ‘the wages of sin is death’ (Romans 3:23; 6:23). But on the cross Jesus paid that penalty, so that his people could go free.

Could God not just have forgiven us without Jesus having to come and die? In other words, could he not have let our wrong thoughts, motivations, words and actions go unpunished? The news headlines show we don’t think much of a human ruler who does the same. We wouldn’t want God turning a blind eye to those who sin against us or those we love – so why should it be different when it comes to our own wrongs? Certainly, God is love – but that doesn’t mean he will set aside his own law. Instead, he did something better. Jesus’ death displayed both God’s righteousness and justice (‘this was to show his righteousness…so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus’ – Romans 3:25-26).

The carol Hark the Herald Angels Sing describes the wonder of what Jesus coming into the world brings: ‘God and sinners reconciled’. That reconciliation was not cheap, however. Jesus, as the carol goes on to say, was ‘born that man no more may die’. For that to be possible, he would have to go to the cross. And if God, unlike Joe Biden, would not even pardon his own Son (as he bore his peoples’ sins) – how could we expect him simply to pardon us?

The good news of the gospel is that the price has been paid – all we have to do is believe.

Published in the Stranraer & Wigtownshire Free Press, 5th December 2024.

Good News For Everyone: Wigtown Event

At the end of September, Good News For Everyone (formerly Gideons UK) held an event in Wigtown Baptist Church, to tie in with the Wigtown Book Festival. There were various updates on the work of the organisation, and also interviews with Stephen, as well as Daniel Sturgeon (pastor of Stranraer Baptist Church). The Wigtownshire Branch is currently looking for new members as they seek to continue their good work of giving out Bibles in schools, placing them in hotels, and producing other helpful resources.

Let’s not fix the NHS by killing the patients

The NHS is 76 years old – and crumbling. How can waiting lists be cut, and the whole system made more efficient? As someone who has been on a waiting list since January, I have more than just a theoretical interest in the question. Wouldn’t the whole thing be a lot more efficient if there were less people in the system? One shortcut to achieving that may turn out to be ‘assisted dying’. Liam McArthur MSP introduced such a bill here in March, which will be discussed soon. South of the border, Keir Starmer seems ready to fast-track a similar one through the Commons. It would give adults who are terminally ill, with a life expectancy of less than six months, an option to end their lives with medical assistance.

Starmer is ’personally committed’ to changing the law and voted to do so in 2015. Other key figures in his party are less sure. The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has said it is a dangerous ideas which she couldn’t back. According to a 2020 British Medical Association survey, only 10 percent of palliative care doctors would prescribe drugs to assist suicide, while 76 percent would not. The 2,500-year-old Hippocratic Oath – long considered the gold standard of medical ethics – contains the pledge: ‘Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course’. It certainly seems ironic that, just a few years after the world shut down to protect the vulnerable, medics could be given authority to help end the lives of some of the same people.

It can’t be denied that the end of some lives causes intense distress both for the individual and their family. Change certainly seems to be in the air. The Royal College of Physicians ended its opposition to changing the law in 2019, with the British Medical Association following suit in 2021. The Royal College of Surgeons of England moved to a neutral position in 2023. 

So what objection can there be to letting people end their suffering?

One obvious one is the pressure it would put on the vulnerable and unsure to end their own lives. There’s the danger of pressure from unscrupulous relatives or those who can’t bear the suffering of their loved one. The terminally ill patient may be frightened of becoming a burden on their family. A desire to ‘Protect the NHS’ may lead to the frail and elderly sacrificing themselves to the great national healthcare god. In Oregon, 50% of those who chose assisted suicide in 2019 cited ‘being a burden on family, friends or caregivers’. Significantly fewer – 33% - gave ‘Inadequate pain control’ as a reason to end their life. Writing in the Times, Matthew Parris suggest this is a good thing: ‘“Your time is up” will never be an order, but may one day be the kind of unspoken hint that everybody understands’. 

Another objection is what has happened in other countries. In short there is no country that has gone down this road that has not either relaxed, or faced pressure to relax, its criteria. In Canada, Physician-Associated Euthanasia (PAE) has been legal since 2016. Initially it was for those over 18 with a ‘grievous and irremediable medical condition…with death reasonably foreseeable’. In 2019, the Superior Court of Quebec ruled that it was unconstitutional to restrict access only to those at the end of life. In 2027 it will be widened out to include anyone with a mental illness. Cancer patients are encouraged to go down the assisted dying route rather than have treatment that might prolong a good quality of life. In the Netherlands, euthanasia with parental consent is allowed for children with life threatening conditions over the age of 12 years and under the age of 1. 

The biggest objection, however, is that life is not ours to take. An article in ‘The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England’ states that ‘If a clinician did not create a life, it may be difficult for them to feel comfortable ending it’. Why is assisting suicide illegal in our country? Surely it stems from a belief that human beings are made in the image of God – or at least a sense that we are somehow different from animals. That doesn’t mean that Christians don’t pray at times for God to take them home to Heaven – but ultimately we do not give ourselves life and so have no right to take it. Our times are in his hands.

Published in the Stranraer & Wigtownshire Free Press, 3rd October 2024.